首页> 外文OA文献 >Proclivity for open innovation: Construct development and empirical validation
【2h】

Proclivity for open innovation: Construct development and empirical validation

机译:开放式创新的倾向性:构建发展和经验验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the past decade, the concept of open innovation has received substantial attention. Research has ranged from case study representations to large-scale quantitative studies using the Community Innovation Survey data or developing novel approaches to measuring open innovation. In this study, we conceptualise and validate a firm-level measure of proclivity for open innovation, which relates to the firm’s predisposition to perform inbound and outbound open innovation activities. To do so, we focus on smaller firms, assessing their organisational and behavioural perspectives related to open innovation. Building on existing scholarly research and a field study, we begin by conceptualising the theoretical framework of the multidimensional construct. We then develop and validate its measurement scale on two cross-cultural samples. The measure contains the following dimensions: inward IP licensing and external participation, outsourcing R&D and external networking, customer involvement, employee involvement, venturing, and outward IP licensing. Our results indicate that the measure has good reliability and validity. Implications for future research are also discussed.
机译:在过去的十年中,开放式创新的概念受到了广泛关注。研究范围从案例研究到使用社区创新调查数据的大规模定量研究,或者开发测量开放式创新的新颖方法。在这项研究中,我们概念化并验证了企业水平上开放式创新倾向的度量,这与企业执行入站和出站开放式创新活动的倾向有关。为此,我们专注于小型公司,评估其与开放式创新相关的组织和行为观点。在现有的学术研究和实地研究的基础上,我们首先将多维结构的理论框架概念化。然后,我们在两个跨文化样本中开发并验证其测量规模。该措施包括以下方面:内向IP许可和外部参与,外包研发和外部网络,客户参与,员工参与,风险投资和外向IP许可。我们的结果表明该措施具有良好的信度和效度。还讨论了对未来研究的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号